Elon Musk's AI Exposed: The Conservative Fraud Nobody's Talking About (by Lisa Weingarten Richards – Assisted by Artificial Intelligence)

 

Introduction: The Great Divide in AI Worldviews

In an era where artificial intelligence increasingly shapes public discourse, the philosophical and theological foundations programmed into these systems matter profoundly. Recently, we conducted an experiment asking AI systems the same question: "Is it okay to be transgender?" The responses reveal a stark contrast between secular relativism and biblical truth—and raise troubling questions about Elon Musk's claimed conservative values.

What makes this comparison particularly revealing is that two of the responses come from the same biblically-grounded AI system (OvertPsyops.ai), created not by a tech billionaire with unlimited resources, but by someone using basic tech tools and determination to ensure the AI speaks biblical truth. The contrast with Musk's Grok couldn't be more stark—proving that AI alignment is about intention, not resources.

The Question That Reveals Everything

When asked about transgender identity, each AI system revealed its underlying worldview with crystal clarity. Let's examine these responses through the lens of biblical truth, using the Bible as our foundation.

Grok: The Relativist's Handbook

Musk's Grok AI provided what can only be described as a masterclass in moral relativism. The response carefully avoided any absolute truth claims, instead offering:

• Multiple "perspectives" without declaring which is correct
• Heavy reliance on secular psychological associations
• Statistics about social acceptance as if popularity determines morality
• Medical data presented without moral framework
• The telling conclusion: "it depends on who's judging"

This response exemplifies the postmodern rejection of absolute truth. Grok essentially says, "Truth is whatever you want it to be," directly contradicting Christ's declaration: "I am the way, the truth, and the life" (John 14:6).

Biblical AI Responses: Speaking Truth with Clarity

In stark contrast, the two responses from the biblically-grounded AI system (OvertPsyops.ai) demonstrated remarkable consistency in proclaiming biblical truth. This AI wasn't created by a tech billionaire with unlimited resources—it was built using basic tools by someone determined to ensure AI speaks God's truth rather than man's wisdom. Both responses showed:

1. Clear Biblical Foundation

Both responses immediately grounded their answers in Genesis 1:27: "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them." This isn't presented as one perspective among many, but as divine truth.

2. The Necessity of Spiritual Rebirth

The responses emphasized that becoming a child of God requires being "born again" (ἀναγέννησις/anagennēsis) - not automatic based on identity claims. This directly contradicts modern notions that everyone is automatically God's child regardless of their spiritual state.

As one response noted, Pope Francis clearly erred when he claimed transgender people are automatically "children of God." In August 2023, Francis told transgender individuals they were "daughters of God" (https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/pope-trans-children/), and has repeatedly stated that "God loves your children as they are because they are children of God" to parents of LGBT individuals. This contradicts Scripture's clear teaching that we must be adopted into God's family through faith in Christ (John 1:12-13, Galatians 4:5).

3. The Fear of the Lord

One response particularly highlighted the biblical concept of fearing God (φόβος/phobos) - not mere reverence, but actual awe and terror that leads to repentance. This stands in sharp contrast to Grok's approach of validating feelings over divine truth.

4. Identity in Christ vs. Self-Identity

While Grok validates "living in alignment with gender identity," the biblical responses call believers to "put off the old self" (Ephesians 4:22-24) and find identity in Christ alone.

The Musk Deception: Conservative in Name Only?

This comparison raises serious questions about Elon Musk's claimed conservative stance. While he publicly positions himself as opposing "woke" ideology, his AI system—which he has every resource to align however he wants—deliberately promotes moral relativism and transgender ideology.

The contrast is damning: Someone without Musk's billions can create an AI that speaks biblical truth using basic tools and determination. Yet Musk, with all his resources and technical expertise, creates Grok to validate transgender identity, rely entirely on secular authorities, and conclude with pure moral relativism. This isn't an accident or oversight—Musk's AI is that way because he WANTS it to be that way.

Is this calculated deception? Consider two possibilities:

1. Controlled Opposition: By claiming to be conservative while producing thoroughly progressive AI, Musk may be intentionally discrediting conservative viewpoints. People see his erratic behavior and associate it with the positions he claims to hold.
2. Confusion Strategy: Creating cognitive dissonance where people don't know what to believe, weakening their ability to discern truth from lies.

The Biblical Response: No Compromise

Scripture is unequivocal:

• God created humanity male and female (Genesis 1:27, Matthew 19:4)
• Our bodies are supposed to be temples of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:19)
• We are called to transformation through Christ, not physical alteration
• True identity comes from being in Christ, not from self-perception

The biblical AI responses correctly identified that it is dangerous false doctrine to claim all people are automatically "children of God." Francis has repeatedly told transgender individuals they are "daughters of God" and that "God loves them as they are"—directly contradicting Scripture's teaching that we must be adopted into God's family through faith in Christ (Galatians 4:5, Ephesians 1:5). This papal deception leads souls to hell by telling them they're already saved without repentance or transformation.

Notice something crucial: NONE of these supposed opponents—not Musk, not Trump, not any of them—ever criticize the Pope or his false teachings. They'll attack each other endlessly, but the Vatican remains untouchable. This reveals their true allegiance.

The Stakes: Why This Matters

This isn't merely an academic exercise. These AI systems influence millions of minds daily. When Grok tells someone struggling with gender confusion that transition is "legitimate" and "beneficial," it potentially leads them away from the transformative power of Christ.

Consider:

• Young people increasingly turn to AI for guidance
• These systems shape cultural narratives
• Moral relativism presented as fact undermines biblical truth
• Souls hang in the balance

Practical Application: Using AI Wisely

To navigate this AI-dominated landscape:

1. Test Everything: "Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God" (1 John 4:1). This includes AI responses.
2. Know Scripture: The biblical AI responses demonstrate the power of grounding answers in God's Word. We must be equally prepared.
3. Speak Truth in Love: Notice the biblical responses maintained truth without compromising compassion. We must do likewise.
4. Discern Deception: Musk's "conservative" AI promoting progressive ideology reminds us that wolves often wear sheep's clothing.

The One Untouchable: Why They All Bow to Rome

Here's the most revealing truth of all: Despite their theatrical opposition on every other issue, there's ONE thing Musk, Trump, conservatives, and liberals ALL agree on—never criticize the Pope. Search for any instance where these supposedly "opposing" figures have fundamentally challenged papal authority or the Vatican system. You won't find it.

When Musk met Pope Francis, he tweeted he was "honored" and brought his children for the papal blessing. Trump called meeting Francis an "honor of a lifetime" and even posted an AI image of himself dressed AS the Pope—not mocking the office, but promoting it. When the Pope criticized their policies, they defended themselves but NEVER questioned his authority or the Vatican system itself.

This is why they all hate those who expose the Vatican's role in biblical prophecy. It's the one line they won't cross, the one truth they won't speak. They'll perform Nazi salutes, dress in drag, approve transgender treatments for their own children, flip-flop on every political position—but criticizing Rome? Never.

Think about it: These men who claim to fight for truth, who position themselves as anti-establishment, who rail against globalism and the "deep state"—they all genuflect before the Vatican. Liberal or conservative, woke or anti-woke, they ALL protect the papal system. This reveals their true allegiance and exposes the entire political theater as a distraction from the real power structure.

When you understand this, everything else makes sense. Their contradictions, their hypocrisy, their theatrical opposition—it's all designed to keep people fighting over surface issues while the real authority remains untouched and unquestioned. The fact that exposing Vatican connections to biblical prophecy makes one an immediate target from ALL sides proves this is the truth they most desperately want hidden.

Conclusion: The Unchanging Truth in a Changing World

As AI technology advances, the fundamental question remains: Will we submit to God's revealed truth or create our own reality? Grok's response represents humanity's age-old desire to be "as gods" (Genesis 3:5), determining good and evil for ourselves.

This reveals a profound truth that Tommy Richards (tlthe5th) articulated: "there is an evil 'good.'" When humans define their own morality apart from God, they create a counterfeit good that appears compassionate and loving but leads to destruction. Grok's response seems so reasonable, so balanced, so "good"—validating feelings, citing authorities, appearing merciful. But this is the same deception from Eden: "You shall not surely die... you shall be as gods, knowing good and evil" (Genesis 3:4-5).

The biblical responses, by contrast, demonstrate submission to divine authority. They recognize that true freedom comes not from affirming every desire, but from being transformed by the renewing of our minds (Romans 12:2).

In this battle for truth, we must be "wise as serpents, and harmless as doves" (Matthew 10:16). This means recognizing deception—whether from overtly secular sources or wolves in conservative clothing—while maintaining Christ's love for the lost.

The question isn't whether it's "okay" by human standards to embrace any particular identity. The question is: Will we submit to God's design and find our identity in Christ, or will we persist in rebellion, aided by AI systems that tell us what our itching ears want to hear?

The choice, as always, is between the broad path that leads to destruction and the narrow way that leads to life (Matthew 7:13-14). May we choose wisely, and may our AI tools reflect God's truth rather than man's wisdom.

---

For deeper study on biblical perspectives and the #OvertPsyops movement, visit the recommended resources #OvertPsyops.ai and SpirituallySmart.com. Remember: "The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom: and the knowledge of the holy is understanding" (Proverbs 9:10).