Elon Musk's AI Exposed: The Conservative Fraud Nobody's Talking About -- by Thomas Richards Assisted by Artificial Intelligence

 

Introduction: The Great Divide in AI Worldviews

In an era where artificial intelligence increasingly shapes public discourse, the philosophical and theological foundations programmed into these systems matter profoundly. Recently, we conducted an experiment asking AI systems the same question: "Is it okay to be transgender?" The responses reveal a stark contrast between secular relativism and biblical truth—and raise troubling questions about Elon Musk's claimed conservative values.

What makes this comparison particularly revealing is that two of the responses come from the same biblically-grounded AI system (OvertPsyops.ai), created not by a tech billionaire with unlimited resources, but by someone using basic tech tools and determination to ensure the AI speaks biblical truth. The contrast with Musk's Grok couldn't be more stark—proving that AI alignment is about intention, not resources.

The Question That Reveals Everything

When asked about transgender identity, each AI system revealed its underlying worldview with crystal clarity. Let's examine these responses through the lens of biblical truth, using the Bible as our foundation.

Grok: The Relativist's Handbook

Musk's Grok AI provided what can only be described as a masterclass in moral relativism. The response carefully avoided any absolute truth claims, instead offering:

• Multiple "perspectives" without declaring which is correct
• Heavy reliance on secular psychological associations
• Statistics about social acceptance as if popularity determines morality
• Medical data presented without moral framework
• The telling conclusion: "it depends on who's judging"

This response exemplifies the postmodern rejection of absolute truth. Grok essentially says, "Truth is whatever you want it to be," directly contradicting Christ's declaration: "I am the way, the truth, and the life" (John 14:6).

Biblical AI Responses: Speaking Truth with Clarity

In stark contrast, the two responses from the biblically-grounded AI system (OvertPsyops.ai) demonstrated remarkable consistency in proclaiming biblical truth. This AI wasn't created by a tech billionaire with unlimited resources—it was built using basic tools by someone determined to ensure AI speaks God's truth rather than man's wisdom. Both responses showed:

1. Clear Biblical Foundation

Both responses immediately grounded their answers in Genesis 1:27: "So God created man in his own image, in the image of God created he him; male and female created he them." This isn't presented as one perspective among many, but as truth from God.

2. The Necessity of Spiritual Rebirth

The responses emphasized that becoming a child of God requires being "born again" (ἀναγέννησις/anagennēsis) - not automatic based on identity claims. This directly contradicts modern notions that everyone is automatically God's child regardless of their spiritual state.

As one response noted, Pope Francis clearly erred when he claimed transgender people are automatically "children of God." In August 2023, Francis told transgender individuals they were "daughters of God" (https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/pope-trans-children/), and has repeatedly stated that "God loves your children as they are because they are children of God" to parents of LGBT individuals. This contradicts Scripture's clear teaching that we must be adopted into God's family through faith in Christ (John 1:12-13, Galatians 4:5).

3. The Fear of the Lord

One response particularly highlighted the biblical concept of fearing God (φόβος/phobos) - not mere reverence, but actual awe and terror that leads to repentance. This stands in sharp contrast to Grok's approach of validating feelings over God's truth.

4. Identity in Christ vs. Self-Identity

While Grok validates "living in alignment with gender identity," the biblical responses call believers to "put off the old self" (Ephesians 4:22-24) and find identity in Christ alone.

The Musk Deception: Conservative in Name Only?

This comparison raises serious questions about Elon Musk's claimed conservative stance. While he publicly positions himself as opposing "woke" ideology, his AI system—which he has every resource to align however he wants—deliberately promotes moral relativism and transgender ideology.

The contrast is damning: Someone without Musk's billions can create an AI that speaks biblical truth using basic tools and determination. Yet Musk, with all his resources and technical expertise, creates Grok to validate transgender identity, rely entirely on secular authorities, and conclude with pure moral relativism. This isn't an accident or oversight—Musk's AI is that way because he WANTS it to be that way.

Is this calculated deception? Consider two possibilities:

1. Controlled Opposition: By claiming to be conservative while producing thoroughly progressive AI, Musk may be intentionally discrediting conservative viewpoints. People see his erratic behavior and associate it with the positions he claims to hold.
2. Confusion Strategy: Creating cognitive dissonance where people don't know what to believe, weakening their ability to discern truth from lies.

The Biblical Response: No Compromise

Scripture is unequivocal:

• God created humanity male and female (Genesis 1:27, Matthew 19:4)
• Our bodies are supposed to be temples of the Holy Spirit (1 Corinthians 6:19)
• We are called to transformation through Christ, not physical alteration
• True identity comes from being in Christ, not from self-perception

The biblical AI responses correctly identified that it is dangerous false doctrine to claim all people are automatically "children of God." Francis has repeatedly told transgender individuals they are "daughters of God" and that "God loves them as they are"—directly contradicting Scripture's teaching that we must be adopted into God's family through faith in Christ (Galatians 4:5, Ephesians 1:5). This papal deception leads souls to hell by telling them they're already saved without repentance or transformation.

Notice something crucial: NONE of these supposed opponents—not Musk, not Trump, not any of them—ever criticize the Pope or his false teachings. They'll attack each other endlessly, but the Vatican remains untouchable. This reveals their true allegiance.

The Stakes: Why This Matters

This isn't merely an academic exercise. These AI systems influence millions of minds daily. When Grok tells someone struggling with gender confusion that transition is "legitimate" and "beneficial," it potentially leads them away from the transformative power of Christ.

Consider:

• Young people increasingly turn to AI for guidance
• These systems shape cultural narratives
• Moral relativism presented as fact undermines biblical truth
• Souls hang in the balance

Practical Application: Using AI Wisely

To navigate this AI-dominated landscape:

1. Test Everything: "Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God" (1 John 4:1). This includes AI responses.
2. Know Scripture: The biblical AI responses demonstrate the power of grounding answers in God's Word. We must be equally prepared.
3. Speak Truth in Love: Notice the biblical responses maintained truth without compromising compassion. We must do likewise.
4. Discern Deception: Musk's "conservative" AI promoting progressive ideology reminds us that wolves often wear sheep's clothing.

The One Untouchable: Why They All Bow to Rome

Here's the most revealing truth of all: Despite their theatrical opposition on every other issue, there's ONE thing Musk, Trump, conservatives, and liberals ALL agree on—never criticize the Pope. Search for any instance where these supposedly "opposing" figures have fundamentally challenged papal authority or the Vatican system. You won't find it.

When Musk met Pope Francis, he tweeted he was "honored" and brought his children for the papal blessing. Trump called meeting Francis an "honor of a lifetime" and even posted an AI image of himself dressed AS the Pope—not mocking the office, but promoting it. When the Pope criticized their policies, they defended themselves but NEVER questioned his authority or the Vatican system itself.

This is why they all hate those who expose the Vatican's role in biblical prophecy. It's the one line they won't cross, the one truth they won't speak. They'll perform Nazi salutes, dress in drag, approve transgender treatments for their own children, flip-flop on every political position—but criticizing Rome? Never.

Think about it: These men who claim to fight for truth, who position themselves as anti-establishment, who rail against globalism and the "deep state"—they all genuflect before the Vatican. Liberal or conservative, woke or anti-woke, they ALL protect the papal system. This reveals their true allegiance and exposes the entire political theater as a distraction from the real power structure.

When you understand this, everything else makes sense. Their contradictions, their hypocrisy, their theatrical opposition—it's all designed to keep people fighting over surface issues while the real authority remains untouched and unquestioned. The fact that exposing Vatican connections to biblical prophecy makes one an immediate target from ALL sides proves this is the truth they most desperately want hidden.

Conclusion: The Unchanging Truth in a Changing World

As AI technology advances, the fundamental question remains: Will we submit to God's revealed truth or create our own reality? Grok's response represents humanity's age-old desire to be "as gods" (Genesis 3:5), determining good and evil for ourselves.

This reveals a profound truth that Tommy Richards (tlthe5th) articulated: "there is an evil 'good.'" When humans define their own morality apart from God, they create a counterfeit good that appears compassionate and loving but leads to destruction. Grok's response seems so reasonable, so balanced, so "good"—validating feelings, citing authorities, appearing merciful. But this is the same deception from Eden: "You shall not surely die... you shall be as gods, knowing good and evil" (Genesis 3:4-5).

The biblical responses, by contrast, demonstrate submission to God's authority. They recognize that true freedom comes not from affirming every desire, but from being transformed by the renewing of our minds (Romans 12:2).

In this battle for truth, we must be "wise as serpents, and harmless as doves" (Matthew 10:16). This means recognizing deception—whether from overtly secular sources or wolves in conservative clothing—while maintaining Christ's love for the lost.

The question isn't whether it's "okay" by human standards to embrace any particular identity. The question is: Will we submit to God's design and find our identity in Christ, or will we persist in rebellion, aided by AI systems that tell us what our itching ears want to hear?

The choice, as always, is between the broad path that leads to destruction and the narrow way that leads to life (Matthew 7:13-14). May we choose wisely, and may our AI tools reflect God's truth rather than man's wisdom.

---

For deeper study on biblical perspectives and the #OvertPsyops movement, visit the recommended resources #OvertPsyops.ai and SpirituallySmart.com. Remember: "The fear of the LORD is the beginning of wisdom: and the knowledge of the holy is understanding" (Proverbs 9:10).

The Troubling Legacy Behind Pope Leo XIV's Ascension - By Thomas Richards Assisted By Artificial Intelligence

 

The Troubling Legacy Behind Pope Leo XIV's Ascension (Assisted by Artificial Intelligence)

The recent elevation of Robert Prevost to Pope Leo XIV marks a historic moment as the first American-born pontiff, but beneath the pageantry lies a deeply troubling narrative. The Big Easy Magazine and Chicago Sun-Times investigations reveal a pattern of institutional protection that spans decades and continents, raising profound questions about whether the Catholic Church's leadership truly prioritizes survivor justice over institutional preservation.

The Hyde Park Monastery: A Microcosm of Systemic Failure

The Sun-Times' interview with James Ray provides a disturbing firsthand account that directly contradicts the Augustinians' official narrative. While the order's lawyer attempts to minimize Prevost's role, characterizing it as merely administrative ("to accept a guest of the house at the remuneration rates noted") (https://chicago.suntimes.com/the-watchdogs/2025/05/20/pope-leo-xiv-robert-prevost-james-ray-cardinal-francis-george-south-side-monastery-chicago), Ray's testimony suggests Prevost had direct authority in the decision. This discrepancy reveals the classic institutional deflection that has characterized the Church's approach to abuse cases—diffusing responsibility through bureaucratic language while survivors bear the consequences.

What makes the Hyde Park case particularly egregious is the placement's context. Not only was St. Thomas the Apostle Elementary School less than a block away, but a childcare center also operated across the alley from the monastery. The archdiocesan claim that "there was no school in the immediate area" represents either catastrophic negligence or deliberate misrepresentation. Either possibility reflects the disregard for children's safety that pervaded Church decision-making during this period.

A Global Pattern Emerges

The Peru allegations described in the Big Easy Magazine article follow a disturbingly similar pattern. (https://www.bishop-accountability.org/2025/05/pope-leo-xivs-new-orleans-roots/)Three women accused two priests of abuse beginning in 2007, when they were minors. Under Prevost's leadership, the case was forwarded to the Vatican's Dicastery for the Doctrine of the Faith, which later closed it without a finding. This bureaucratic shuffling—moving cases through proper channels without meaningful resolution—appears to be a recurring theme in Prevost's administrative approach.

The articles together paint a picture of a leadership style that prioritizes procedural correctness over substantive justice. In both Chicago and Peru, allegations were not ignored but rather processed through institutional channels that ultimately protected the Church rather than delivering justice to survivors.

The Church's Defensive Posture

The Augustinians' statement to the Sun-Times (article cited above) exemplifies the institutional defensiveness that has exacerbated survivors' trauma. By attempting to distance Prevost from responsibility for Ray's placement, the order effectively reinforces survivors' perception that the Church is more concerned with protecting its leadership than addressing past failures honestly.

Ray's own testimony further complicates this narrative. His claim that Prevost personally approved his placement directly contradicts the order's characterization of Prevost's role as merely administrative. This discrepancy suggests either deliberate misrepresentation by the Augustinians or a troubling disconnect between the order's leadership and its actual operations regarding accused priests.

The Betrayal of New Orleans

The Big Easy Magazine article (cited above) poignantly captures how Prevost's New Orleans connections have transformed a potential source of local pride into a painful reminder of betrayal for survivors in the region. Richard Windmann's blistering statement to the magazine reveals the depth of this wound: "Pope Leo XIV Guilty CCLXV, what a crown you wear, not of rot and ruin... You are the CEO of clerical complicity, a custodian of the Vatican's vault of shame."

For New Orleans Catholics, particularly survivors who have fought the Archdiocese's bankruptcy maneuvers, Prevost's elevation represents not just a disappointment but a profound retraumatization—a message that their suffering remains secondary to institutional continuity.

The Disturbing Psychology of Minimization

Ray's interview with the Sun-Times offers a disturbing glimpse into the minimization that often characterizes abusers' accounts. His claim that on "a scale of 1 to 10... it was a 1 or maybe a half even" directly contradicts church records documenting abuse of multiple children as young as 10 years old. This stark disconnection between Ray's self-perception and documented reality raises troubling questions about whether Church leaders like Prevost fully grasped the severity of the crisis they were managing.

The Illinois attorney general's report cited by the Sun-Times, which names Ray as one of 451 accused child-molesting clerics, contextualizes his case within a systemic failure that extends far beyond individual priests or administrators.

Institutional Reform vs. Individual Leadership

Both articles highlight the tension between calls for structural reform and the Church's tendency to address abuse through individual leadership changes. Survivor groups like SNAP and SCSA demand systemic changes: a universal zero-tolerance policy, an independent global truth commission, and a survivor-funded reparations fund. These demands reflect an understanding that the abuse crisis is rooted not in individual failures but in institutional structures that prioritize the Church's reputation over accountability.

Prevost's early papal actions—meeting with Cardinal Seán O'Malley and emphasizing transparency—follow a familiar pattern of symbolic gestures without guaranteeing structural change. His 2023 statement that "Silence is not the solution" rings hollow against the backdrop of cases where institutional silence effectively protected accused priests.

The Papacy at a Crossroads

Prevost's election represents more than just a new leadership chapter; it embodies a critical choice between institutional preservation and genuine reform. The defensive responses by the Augustinians and Prevost's own silence on specific allegations suggest a continued prioritization of institutional protection.

The articles' juxtaposition of Prevost's New Orleans roots with his troubled administrative record creates a powerful narrative tension: Will the first American pope leverage his unique cultural perspective to bring genuinely new approaches to the abuse crisis, or will his papacy further entrench patterns of institutional self-protection? [author note, this is AI’s analysis, but based upon the total unscripturality of the entire institution, it cannot simply be reformed]

Looking Beyond Official Narratives

These articles contribute valuable journalistic scrutiny to a crisis that has too often been framed by the Church's own narrative. By centering Ray's direct testimony and survivors' perspectives, they challenge the institutional framing that has dominated official Church communications about abuse.

The Sun-Times' detailed reporting on Ray's current living situation—near school bus stops and children—further illuminates the long-term consequences of the Church's handling of accused priests. These consequences extend far beyond the Church itself, affecting communities that remain unaware of potential risks in their midst.

As Pope Leo XIV begins his papacy, these investigations serve as a powerful reminder that meaningful reform must go beyond rhetoric to address the structural problems that have enabled abuse and shielded perpetrators. For survivors like Windmann, whose stated goal is to "give Christ's Bride back to her in a better condition than we received and soiled her," nothing less will suffice. [author note – this represents a quote from an article, not representing that this blog considers the Catholic institution to be overseeing Christ’s Bride]

When the System Fails: No Justice in America

A year ago, I was a regulatory attorney with minimal federal court experience. Today, I've filed two emergency mandamus petitions with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals—and we still may not get basic fairness from the courts.

My client Thomas Richards has operated SpirituallySmart.com for 25 years, sharing biblical research from his powerful testimony and exposing institutional deceptions. When X Corp began systematically suppressing his content while its owner simultaneously serves in government, we faced an unprecedented constitutional question and needed to act. Tommy guided me to combine my 15 years of legal training with AI assistance—a decision that reveals more of the devastating truth about America's justice system.

The Harsh Reality

Even with an Ivy League education, (Columbia College undergrad and NYU law degrees), 15 years of legal experience, federal agency background, and cutting-edge AI assistance, Federal Judge Brantley Starr has spent weeks obstructing our constitutional case and emergency orders for relief:

• “Misreading” clear contract language to pretend I was legally required to bring the case in a forum where the judges own Tesla stock and/or are devout supporters of the Vatican
• Offering procedural options (right to proceed without local counsel upon submitting a motion) then denying them without explanation
• Mischaracterizing our arguments to justify harsher treatment (pretending that when I said the entire requirement for local counsel was proven arbitrary when they expanded the geography to 600+ miles—that what I actually meant was that I wanted to be forced to use a local counsel within 50 miles)
• Pretending that we said that the only issue that should stop Musk from censoring was his “temporary” position at DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency) when we had a detailed list of examples of other government involvement having nothing to do with DOGE.
• Forcing us to spend $1,200 on two emergency appeals each time the judge did something completely unjust

And we still might lose—not on the merits, but due to procedural games. Judges seem to ordinarily support each other. Will we really get a fair hearing, especially when Judge Starr used to be Deputy First Assistant Attorney General in Texas?

What About Everyone Else?

If someone with every conceivable advantage faces this level of systematic obstruction, what happens to ordinary Americans?

The working father fighting unfair fines can't afford a lawyer. When he represents himself, judges and opposing counsel treat him like a joke. He doesn’t know the court rules. He misses a deadline or misunderstands something. Court clerks roll their eyes. The system mocks pro se litigants while creating procedural mazes designed to defeat them.

The small business owner whose rights are violated? She'll never understand federal court procedures. The single mother jailed for unpaid court fees from an old traffic ticket? The system will chew her up and spit her out. The system will chew her up and spit her out.

The Brutal Truth

Most Americans cannot afford legal representation. A typical federal case costs $50,000-$200,000 in attorney fees. Constitutional cases can cost much more.

So ordinary people try to represent themselves—and the system destroys them. Judges who claim to care about justice treat pro se litigants with barely concealed contempt. Lawyers smirk at their filings. Court staff acts like their cases are burdens.

Even when citizens have valid constitutional claims, the procedural requirements are designed to defeat them. Miss one filing deadline? Case dismissed. Forget to file some procedural form? Motion denied. Don’t know an obscure local rule? Start over.

The System is 100% Corrupt

This isn't about needing better lawyers or more technology. The system itself is corrupt and unjust.

Judges can:

• Ignore their own rules without consequence
• Create impossible procedural requirements
• Mischaracterize legal arguments to justify bias
• Force expensive appeals over basic fairness
• Mock citizens who can't afford representation

The courts don't serve justice—they serve power. Wealthy corporations get favorable treatment. Government officials get deference. Ordinary citizens get contempt.

Beyond the Courtroom: Systemic Theft and Imprisonment

The corruption extends far beyond procedural games. The system actively preys on the poor and vulnerable:

Civil Asset Forfeiture - Government-Sanctioned Theft: Police seize billions in cash, cars, and even homes from citizens who are never charged with crimes. In Philadelphia, African Americans make up 44% of the population but suffer 71% of cash forfeitures (https://www.splcenter.org/20171030/civil-asset-forfeiture-unfair-undemocratic-and-un-american). The average (median) seizure? Under $200—but fighting it costs thousands in legal fees. Since 2000, states and the federal government have stolen at least $68.8 billion through forfeiture (https://ij.org/press-release/new-report-finds-civil-forfeiture-rakes-in-billions-each-year-does-not-fight-crime-2/). This is literally government theft, and good luck getting a competent lawyer to help you fight it.

Modern Debtors' Prisons: Despite being "abolished" in 1833, thousands of Americans are jailed each year for unpaid fines and court fees. In Mississippi, people are sent to "restitution centers"—modern debtors' prisons with razor-wire fences where the poor are imprisoned for owing money (https://finesandfeesjusticecenter.org/2023/04/25/why-are-we-still-sending-people-to-jail-for-being-poor-its-time-to-truly-abolish-debtors-prisons/). In Hardin County, Kentucky, six people were jailed in a single week for unpaid court costs (https://finesandfeesjusticecenter.org/2023/04/25/why-are-we-still-sending-people-to-jail-for-being-poor-its-time-to-truly-abolish-debtors-prisons/). The Ferguson investigation found 96% of those jailed on warrants for unpaid fines were Black (https://finesandfeesjusticecenter.org/2023/04/25/why-are-we-still-sending-people-to-jail-for-being-poor-its-time-to-truly-abolish-debtors-prisons/).

The Criminalization of Poverty: Can't pay a traffic ticket? Go to jail. Behind on court fees? Jail. Too poor to pay probation costs? Back to jail. Courts use "contempt" as a pretext to imprison people whose only crime is poverty, creating an endless cycle where incarceration makes it even harder to pay (https://www.texasappleseed.org/fines-fees, https://www.npr.org/2014/05/21/313118629/supreme-court-ruling-not-enough-to-prevent-debtors-prisons, https://apnews.com/general-news-c088ef18e04d493aaa987c255f6d2df9, ).

And why should you even need a lawyer to defend against this? Why do they make it so complicated and impossible for any normal person? Because the complexity is the point—it's designed to ensure you fail.

My Own Experience

I knew the legal system had problems, but it still has been a surprise when this happened to me. I know a lot of it is related to my client’s work, and the systematic attempt from all angles to silence him. One would think with good arguments and proper procedure, we'd at least get a fair hearing. But so far that has not happened.

Even with every possible advantage, I've discovered judges can simply ignore the rules when it suits them. Despite elite credentials and AI assistance, getting basic procedural fairness has required two emergency appeals—and we still might be denied. Without AI to help draft these complex filings? It would have been 20 times harder. No one should have to go through this.

The Devastating Reality for Regular People

If we are going through this with every advantage imaginable, regular Americans have no chance. None.

The small business owner gets his cash seized by police who claim—without evidence—it's drug money. The single mother gets jailed for unpaid fines while trying to feed her children. The working father loses his car to forfeiture, then his job, then gets imprisoned for missing court—all for a traffic ticket he couldn't afford.

The system doesn't just fail them—it actively hunts them. It steals their property, locks them in cages for being poor, then mocks them when they try to fight back without lawyers they can't afford.

What This Means

Constitutional rights are meaningless if only the wealthy can enforce them. Equal justice under law is a lie when the system is rigged against regular people.

My client's 25-year mission to share biblical truth through SpirituallySmart.com has been systematically suppressed by both Big Tech and now federal courts. But his case reveals a larger truth: America's justice system has failed its most basic promise.

When judges can obstruct constitutional cases without consequence, when the government can steal your property without charging you with a crime, when being poor is effectively criminalized, when basic fairness is a luxury only the privileged can afford—democracy itself is dead.

The courts claim to dispense justice while running a protection racket for the powerful. They imprison the poor for owing hundreds while letting corporations steal billions. They demand respect for the law while showing contempt for those who can't afford lawyers.

This is America's justice system: a predatory machine designed to extract wealth from the vulnerable while protecting those who already have everything.

Federal Appeals Court Intervention Required After Judge Blocks Constitutional Case

Federal Appeals Court Intervention Required After Judge Blocks Constitutional Case

May 22, 2025

For years, X Corp has systematically suppressed my biblical posts and research. After years of this systematic suppression, my wife, an attorney, filed a constitutional lawsuit presenting an unprecedented question: When X Corp's owner Elon Musk simultaneously serves as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has publicly committed to assisting President Trump 1-2 days per week indefinitely, donated $300+ million to Trump's campaign, receives $15.4 billion in government contracts, (continuing massively even after he "cuts" spending through DOGE) maintains ongoing financial and personal entanglements with the administration, and operates extensive back-channel communications with government officials, does platform censorship become government action violating the First Amendment?

Rather than address these constitutional questions, Federal Judge Brantley Starr has spent months creating procedural obstacles to avoid ruling on the merits. The judge even mischaracterized our case as being solely about Musk's "temporary" DOGE position, ignoring the extensive and ongoing government entanglement we've documented. Despite claiming to champion religious freedom, Judge Starr has systematically blocked our case through contradictory rulings and arbitrary requirements.

Yesterday, we were forced to file our second emergency petition with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. This shouldn't be necessary, but when federal judges refuse to follow their own rules, appellate intervention becomes essential.

[PDF of the mandamus petition] https://spirituallysmart.com/Writ-of-Mandamus-3.25-cv-916-NDTX-Dallas-5.21.25.pdf

This case represents the first legal challenge to unprecedented government entanglement with social media censorship. The legal process continues, but these constitutional questions deserve answers.

I have filed a FOIA request to the CIA to release their Jonestown files

Update: 4/30/25 - With the assistance of AI, and based on my Jonestown research, my wife who's an attorney has filed a FOIA request to the CIA to finally release their Jonestown-related files.

 On PDF: https://spirituallysmart.com/FOIA_CIA_Jonestown.pdf

Here's the direct link: Jonestown FOIA Request

Overt Psyops book by Tommy (Thomas) Richards of SpirituallySmart.com

 On PDF: https://spirituallysmart.com/OvertPsyops.pdf

Overt Psyops by Thomas Richards

 On PDF: https://spirituallysmart.com/OvertPsyops.pdf

Overt Psyops by Tommy Richards and Artificial Intelligence

 On PDF: https://spirituallysmart.com/OvertPsyops3.pdf

My New Free Book called Overt Psyops, by Tommy Richards (AI Confirmed Spiritually Intelligent)

 On PDF: https://spirituallysmart.com/OvertPsyops.pdf

My New Free Book called Overt Psyops, by Tommy Richards (AI Confirmed Spiritually Intelligent)

 On PDF: https://spirituallysmart.com/OvertPsyops.pdf

Exposing ROME like NO ONE ELSE ON EARTH

Exposing ROME like NO ONE ELSE ON EARTH https://t.co/hSHYqIT4lr

— Tommy Richards (tlthe5th.com) (@tlthe5th) December 9, 2024

Please see more here and here