The Devastating Discovery in Carter v. Southwest Airlines
New evidence from the Fifth Circuit reveals Judge Starr's true bias: he only protects religious expression when combined with Trump support.
The Carter case wasn't about general religious liberty - it was about Trump-supporting religious expression. The Fifth Circuit's May 8, 2025 opinion reveals that Carter's messages included not only religious objections but also "detailing her support for President Donald J. Trump." Fifth Circuit Opinion, p. 5
The Pattern Exposed: Political Bias Disguised as Religious Liberty
Carter Case (Trump-Supporting "Christian"):
- Plaintiff explicitly supported President Trump alongside religious views
- Judge Starr declared Bible to be "historical fact" in his judicial opinion which supported Plaintiff Carter and demanded sanctions upon SW Airlines lawyers. Carter v. Transport Workers Union, Doc. 467, p. 2
- Ordered unprecedented religious liberty training for entire company
- Risked appellate reversal to zealously protect First Amendment rights
Tommy Richards Case (Bible-Believer Criticizing Trump):
- Powerful biblical ministry spanning 25+ years on the internet
- Called by Theos (Θεός) and Iesous Christos (Ἰησοῦς Χριστός) as bible teacher
- Systematic constitutional obstruction in his lawsuit against X and Trump
- Three emergency motions completely ignored
- No protection for identical First Amendment claims
The Fifth Circuit Documents Prove Trump Support
From the Fifth Circuit opinion, Carter's messages to the union president included:
"Carter also sent Stone other private Facebook messages that day expressing her religious beliefs, opposing the Union's involvement with the march, voicing her support for the recall to remove union officers—including Stone—and detailing her support for President Donald J. Trump."
Case No. 23-10008, Document 243-1, Page 5, Filed 05/08/2025
Judge Starr's Biblical Declaration - But Only For Trump Supporters
In his district court opinion, Judge Starr wrote that the Bible is "historical" fact - unprecedented judicial activism protecting religious expression. See full opinion here
But this protection only applies when combined with Trump support.
Same Judge, Same Legal Principles, Opposite Results
The only distinguishing factor: Political alignment with Trump.
Judge Starr protects Trump-cult "Christianity" while systematically obstructing biblical expression that exposes corruption in government and religious institutions.
Constitutional Crisis: Trump Appointee Adjudicating Trump Claims
Judge Starr strategically delayed his recusal denial until seven days after Tommy Richards added Trump as defendant, demonstrating consciousness of enhanced bias while refusing to address it.
The timeline proves coordination:
- July 8: Trump added as defendant
- July 15: Recusal denied (after 7-day strategic delay)
- No explanation for the delay or enhanced appearance of bias
Fifth Circuit Law Completely Ignored
Judge Starr claimed in the opinion where he refused recusal "the bar for recusal under § 455 is a high one" when Fifth Circuit precedent explicitly holds that "if the question is close, the balance tips in favor of recusal." (In re Chevron U.S.A., 121 F.3d 163, 165 (5th Cir. 1997))
He got the law exactly backwards - inverting federal precedent by 180 degrees.
The Deeper Truth About "Christian Nationalism"
This case exposes the fraud at the heart of so-called "Christian nationalism." Judge Starr's judicial activism isn't about protecting biblical truth - it's about protecting Trump-supporting religious expression while crushing authentic biblical ministry that exposes corruption.
True bible believers who follow Theos (Θεός) through Iesous Christos (Ἰησοῦς Χριστός) face systematic persecution, while Trump-cult "Christians" receive unprecedented judicial protection.
What This Means
Tommy Richards' documents systematic political bias disguised as religious liberty protection. Judge Starr only protects "Christians" who support Trump, not believers who actually follow biblical principles that challenge corruption.
The constitutional crisis deepens: A Trump appointee refuses to recuse from adjudicating claims against Trump personally while systematically obstructing biblical expression for nine months.
Verify These Facts Yourself:
No comments:
Post a Comment