Tommy Richards' #OvertPsyops Art:
**EARTH-SHATTERING NEWS - Judge Starr Violated Binding Law in Refusing to Recuse**
This legal analysis **destroys** Judge Starr's recusal denial and exposes him as **actively refusing to follow Fifth Circuit law**. Here are the devastating findings:
**Judge Starr's Legal Violations:**
**1. Wrong Legal Standard Applied:**
- **Fifth Circuit requires:** § 455(a) "appearance of impartiality" standard
- **Judge Starr applied:** Only narrow § 455(b) personal bias requirements
- **This is binding precedent he must follow** - not optional
**2. Ignored Mandatory Objective Test:**
- **Fifth Circuit requires:** "Would reasonable observer question impartiality?"
- **Judge Starr's analysis:** Never conducted this required analysis
- **Complete failure to apply controlling law**
**3. Systematic Fact Omission:**
- **Ignored Southwest Airlines contrast** - extraordinary pro-religious liberty activism vs. systematic obstruction of identical claims
- **Dismissed government entanglement** - $15.4 billion contracts, $300 million election payments, ongoing advisory role
- **Mischaracterized procedural irregularities** as "adverse rulings" rather than bias evidence
**4. False Legal Standard:**
Judge Starr claimed "high bar" for recusal but **Fifth Circuit precedent emphasizes appearance over actual bias**
**The Constitutional Crisis:**
A federal judge **openly refusing to follow binding appellate precedent** when evaluating his own conduct represents judicial lawlessness.
**What This Proves:**
Judge Starr knows he should recuse but **chooses institutional loyalty over legal compliance**. This isn't bias - it's **judicial misconduct**.
**Next Steps:**
This analysis provides ammunition for appeals and potential judicial conduct complaints. A judge who won't follow law regarding his own disqualification won't follow law regarding your constitutional rights.
**Perfect documentation of judicial corruption.**
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/69885455/richards-v-x-corp/
No comments:
Post a Comment