SCOTUS's Gatekeeping: How the 5-Day Processing Lag Denies Emergency Relief to Anyone Outside Their Club

 

                                            Artwork by Tommy Richards using Photoshop 7.0

SCOTUS's Gatekeeping: How the 5-Day Processing Lag Denies Emergency Relief to Anyone Outside Their Club

The Myth of Equal Access to Justice - Exposed by One Photograph

All δόξα (doxa - glory) to Ἰησοῦς Χριστός (Iēsous Christos - Jesus Christ) and Θεός (Theos - God) our Πατήρ (Patēr - Father) for exposing this ἀλήθεια (alētheia - truth)!

 

Lisa Weingarten Richards has:

·        Columbia University undergraduate degree

·        NYU Law School

·        177 LSAT score (99.8 percentile)

·        10+ years as federal bank regulator at the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency

·        Experience at a top-100 AmLaw firm

·        15+ years practicing law

·        Virginia Bar #96671

·        New York Bar #4932570

None of it matters.

Lisa still couldn't e-file the emergency application at SCOTUS because she's not in their “club”. SCOTUS requires attorneys to be admitted to their bar before they can e-file. Unlike most circuit courts where you can file emergency writs without prior admission, SCOTUS demands a lengthy admissions process requiring sponsorship by two current SCOTUS bar members.

When you're challenging Google, X Corp, major entertainment companies, and the systematic censorship of Tommy Richards biblical content that exposes the Vatican, try finding two SCOTUS bar members willing to sponsor you. When you have 5 days before an emergency hearing, try completing an admissions process that takes weeks or months, or even finding a lawyer admitted to SCOTUS who will efile your petition.

Impossible.

So Tommy Richards has to file pro se and gets trapped in a 5-day processing lag - not because of lack of an attorney with qualifications, but because the gatekeeping system ensures only establishment-approved attorneys can access emergency procedures.

Sharon Campbell: Inside the Club, Refusing to Help

Local counsel Sharon K Campbell is admitted to the SCOTUS bar. She could have e-filed the emergency application with a single click, creating an immediate timestamped electronic record that would have bypassed the 5-day processing lag entirely. And she would have gotten paid for it.

She refused saying: "I am actually admitted to SCOTUS but I have never filed anything and do not want to be attorney of record at SCOTUS for this case."

Sharon is in the club. She has the access. She could have prevented everything that followed. But she doesn't want to be associated with a case challenging the beast’s regime. So she said no, forcing Tommy into pro se filing where the 5-day processing lag was guaranteed to deny emergency relief.

This is how the club protects itself - not through explicit conspiracy, but through a thousand small acts of cowardice by attorneys who have access but refuse to use it for cases that challenge powerful interests.

Undeniable Proof: One Photograph Proves the Systematic Denial

A single photograph of Thomas Richards's emergency application cover page exposes the entire gatekeeping system.

What the Photo Shows:

1.      Courier tracking label: Delivery to Supreme Court "Clerks Office" on "11/7/2025 1:32:27 PM"

2.     Sender: Christine Bartolomo (from a courier service)

3.     Recipient: Clerk’s Office

 

Then next to this a stamp on the same page:

 

4.     SCOTUS clerk's stamp: "RECEIVED NOV 12 2025 OFFICE OF THE CLERK SUPREME COURT U.S."

5.     Both pieces of evidence on the same document

SCOTUS physically received the emergency application on November 7, 2025 at 1:32:27 PM. Yet only stamped it "RECEIVED NOV 12 2025" - five days later, on the exact day of the hearing the application sought to stay.

This 5-day processing lag isn't accidental. It's systematic. And it only applies to people who can't e-file - which means anyone outside the SCOTUS bar member club, regardless of their legal qualifications.

The Two-Tier System: E-Filing for the Club, Processing Delays for Everyone Else

When Lisa first contacted the Clerk's office about emergency applications, they told her that all physical filings get routed to "some other location" first before reaching the Clerk - creating a guaranteed delay. The only way to avoid this delay? E-filing, which creates an immediate timestamped electronic record.

But SCOTUS does not allow e-filing unless you're already admitted to their bar.

This Creates Multiple Levels of Gatekeeping:

Level 1: Pro Se Litigants

·        Cannot e-file at all

·        Guaranteed 5-day processing lag

·        Emergency relief structurally impossible if deadline is less than 5 days

Level 2: Attorneys Not Yet Admitted to SCOTUS Bar

·        Cannot e-file without prior admission

·        Admission requires sponsorship by two current SCOTUS bar members

·        Admission process takes weeks or months - impossible for emergencies

·        Finding sponsors for controversial cases challenging powerful interests? Nearly impossible

·        Result -- Cannot submit anything to SCOTUS

Level 3: Attorneys Already Admitted to SCOTUS Bar

·        Can e-file with immediate timestamped receipt

·        No processing lag

·        Emergency relief actually possible

·        But most refuse to file controversial cases (like Sharon Campbell)

 

Robert Meek: Years in the System, Knows Exactly What He's Doing

Robert Meek graduated high school in 1963. He's been working in the federal court system for several years and is former military. A perfect gatekeeper for SCOTUS emergency applications to support the system denying relief to outsiders.

What Meek Did:

·        November 7: Lisa called him asking how to file an emergency application

·        Meek told her they could email it to him

·         The complete application was emailed to him on November 7

·        They also had it courier-delivered on November 7 (received at 1:32 PM per tracking)

·        Meek never acknowledged the email

·        Meek never responded to the November 13 follow-up email asking for the docket number

·        But the next day, November 14, Meek signed and mailed a letter claiming SCOTUS "received" it November 12

Why Meek's Response Was Misleading:

When Meek told Lisa she could email the application to him, she thought it was handled. Why would he say she could email it if he intended to completely ignore it? In her mind, it was done and delivered on November 7.

If Meek had been honest and said "sure you can email it but I'll just ignore the email and you'll be stuck in the 5-day processing lag anyway," Lisa would have spent the entire weekend searching for a SCOTUS bar member willing to e-file it.

Instead, Meek's response created the impression that emailing was sufficient. He knew the email wouldn't bypass the processing lag. He knew physical filings go through "some other location" for 5 days. He knew the November 12 hearing date. He did nothing.

This isn't passive bureaucratic indifference. This is active gatekeeping by someone who knows exactly how the system works and uses it to deny emergency relief to anyone outside the club.

This was page 2 of the application, explaining that the hearing for which the petition was filed was scheduled November 12: 

The Complete Timeline - Documented by Courier Tracking

November 7, 2025 at 1:32:27 PM:

·        Courier delivers emergency application to Supreme Court "Clerks Office"

·        Courier Christine Bartolomo delivers it to SCOTUS for the Clerk (documented on tracking label)

·        Richards emails complete application to Robert Meek (as Meek instructed)

·        Richards serves X Corp's counsel via email and U.S. Mail

·        Richards includes Certificate of Service under penalty of perjury certifying November 7 filing

·        Cost: $450 for DC printing + $80 courier = $530 total

·        The filing explicitly states this involves a November 12 hearing requiring immediate stay

November 7-12:

·        Complete silence from SCOTUS

·        Application sits in processing for 5 days

·        Never assigned a docket number

·        Never appears on public SCOTUS docket

·        Meek never responds to the email

November 11, 2025 (Veterans Day - court closed):

·        Tommy forced to file voluntary dismissal

·        Judge Starr demanded Tommy appear in person at November 12 hearing

·        Starr demanded Tommy obtain ECF access on a day the clerk's office was closed

·        Starr implied sanctions if Tommy didn't appear physically in person in Texas 2 days later

·        With no relief from SCOTUS after 4 days, dismissal was only option

November 12, 2025:

·        SCOTUS stamps application "RECEIVED NOV 12 2025" (processing date, not receipt date)

·        The hearing date - making any relief impossible

·        Starr immediately cancels hearing after dismissal

November 13, 2025:

·        Richards emails Meek asking for docket number

·        No response from Meek

Shortly After November 13:

·        Letter arrives at Tommy and Lisa's home address in Virginia

·        The only address on the filing was Lisa’s law office address in Fairfax, Virginia, yet somehow SCOTUS found and sent to their home address

·        Letter signed by Robert Meek claims the document was "received November 12"

·        Uses coerced dismissal of the Richards v X case under Judge Starr as excuse to return application

·        All $530 of materials returned

·        Directs to Rule 20 mandamus requiring 40 bound copies (even more expense)

 

The Certificate of Service Proves November 7 Filing

Supreme Court rules require contemporaneous service on opposing counsel when you file an emergency application. Tommy complied:

·        Served X Corp's counsel via email on November 7

·        Served X Corp's counsel via U.S. Mail on November 7

·        Certified under penalty of perjury that he served opposing counsel and filed with SCOTUS on November 7

You cannot serve opposing counsel with a document you haven't filed yet. Tommy's sworn certificate proves November 7 filing.

Meek's letter uses the processing date and ignores the actual receipt date - and ignores that he personally received the email on November 7 and could have acted on it immediately.

If SCOTUS Actually Cared About Security, They'd Allow E-Filing for Everyone

SCOTUS claims physical filings must be routed through "some other location" before reaching the Clerk - presumably for security screening. But this security concern has an obvious solution:

Allow everyone to e-file.

E-filing would:

·        Eliminate security concerns about physical packages

·        Create immediate timestamped electronic records

·        Make receipt dates indisputable

·        Give everyone equal access to emergency procedures

·        Prevent the 5-day processing lag trap

But SCOTUS refuses to allow e-filing unless you're already admitted to their bar through a lengthy sponsorship process. This proves security isn't the real concern.

 

The Systematic Pattern Across Tommy's Federal Litigation

This SCOTUS gatekeeping fits perfectly into the coordinated pattern:

Judge Brantley Starr (N.D. Texas):

·        Creates impossible deadlines (ECF when clerk closed)

·        Demands personal appearance

·        Threatens sanctions

·        On Veterans Day with the court closed, immediately cancels hearing once dismissal achieved

Fifth Circuit:

·        Denied four mandamus petitions without explanation

·        Refused to supervise Starr's violations

Supreme Court:

·        Prohibits e-filing for non-members

·        Creates 5-day processing lag for physical filings

·        Meek receives email November 7, ignores it

·        Stamps application "RECEIVED NOV 12" (processing date)

·        Uses processing date in letter, ignoring actual November 7 receipt

·        Never dockets publicly

·        Returns $530 of materials

·        Demands expensive mandamus re-filing

The Same Playbook: Create structural barriers, exploit them to deny relief, use processing dates instead of facts, price out regular people, never address substance.

Biblical Πνεῦμα (Pneuma - Spirit) Context

Ψαλμοί (Psalmoi - Psalms) 94:20-21 (NIV):

"Can a corrupt throne be allied with you—a throne that brings on misery by its decrees? The wicked band together against the righteous and condemn the innocent to death."

Ματθαίος (Matthaios - Matthew) 10:26 (NASB):

"Therefore do not fear them, for there is nothing concealed that will not be revealed, or hidden that will not be known."

Ἰωάννης (Iōannēs - John) 8:44 (NASB):

"You are of your father the devil, and you want to do the desires of your father. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth because there is no truth in him. Whenever he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own nature, for he is a liar and the father of lies."

The photo proves everything: November 7 courier tracking showing 1:32 PM delivery. November 12 SCOTUS stamp. Both on the same document. Five days that make emergency relief impossible for anyone outside the club.

Θεός (Theos - God) the Πατήρ (Patēr - Father) through Χριστός (Christos) Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous - Jesus Christ) exposes all ἄλογος (alogos - illogical/without logic) patterns, including gatekeeping systems disguised as neutral procedure.

 

The Documentary Evidence

·        Photo of application showing both courier tracking and SCOTUS stamp

·        November 7 email from Tommy to Meek

·        November 7 service on X Corp's counsel

·        November 7 Certificate of Service under oath

·        November 13 follow-up email to Meek (unanswered)

·        Meek's letter claiming "received November 12"

·        Courier affidavit (forthcoming)

The truth is visible on the document itself: November 7 delivery, November 12 stamp. Five days of bureaucratic processing that makes emergency relief impossible unless you're in the club.

The Path Forward

Every gatekeeping mechanism creates evidence of itself. The photo proves the 5-day lag. The email to Meek proves he knew on November 7. The certificate of service proves November 7 filing. Sharon's refusal proves club members won't help controversial cases. The admissions requirements prove the gatekeeping is structural.

The ἀλήθεια (alētheia - truth) doesn't surrender to institutional barriers. The λόγος (logos - Word/Logic/Reason) of Θεός (Theos - God) through Χριστός (Christos) Ἰησοῦς (Iēsous - Jesus) exposes all ἄλογος (alogos) patterns - including systems that claim equal access while systematically excluding anyone outside their club.

 

All πίστις (pistis - faith) and δόξα (doxa - glory) to Θεός (Theos - God) the Πατήρ (Patēr - Father) through Ἰησοῦς Χριστός (Iēsous Christos - Jesus Christ) who exposes gatekeeping disguised as procedure!

 

Documentation

·        LWRbot.ai - Richards v X Corp & Trump chatbot

·        OvertPsyops.ai - Exposing systematic patterns

·        Richards v. X Corp "autopsy" - at CourtListener  Richards v. X Corp, 3:25-cv-00916 – CourtListener.com

 

#OvertPsyops exposing ἄλογος (alogos - illogical) gatekeeping one photographed document at a time

 

Elite credentials. Decades of experience. None of it matters if you're not in their club.