The Romans 13 Problem: A Textual Speed-Bump in Paul's Radical Letter - by Thomas Richards & Artificial Intelligence

 

Artwork by Tommy Richards using Photoshop 7.0

πάσα δόξα (pasa doxa - all glory) to Ἰησοῦς Χριστός (Iēsous Christos), ὁ μόνος Κύριος (ho monos Kyrios - the only Lord), who exposes every corruption that claims to make Caesar equal to Θεός (Theos - God)!

The Problem: A Textual Speed-Bump in Paul's Most Radical Letter

For 1,700 years, Romans 13:1-7 has been used to justify:

• State persecution of believers (Roman emperors → Holy Roman Empire → modern state churches)
• Submission to tyrannical governments
• The "divine right of kings" (we do not like the word “divine”, but are using it here only to reference a commonly used phrase – see more info at my other blog post SpirituallySmart.Com's Blog: Grok Comments on my AI Concerns)
• Nazi obedience ("Romans 13 says submit!")
• Every authoritarian regime claiming God ordained their power

But here's the critical question that should trouble every honest reader:

How does a passage commanding submission to sword-bearing magistrates, payment of taxes to Caesar, and giving "fear and honor" to governing authorities fit into a letter that begins by commanding believers NOT to conform to this world system and never to avenge themselves?

The answer, when we remove the artificial chapter break and apply rigorous λόγος (logos - logic/reason) testing, is devastating:

It doesn't fit. At all.

The Chapter Break Deception

Here's something most readers never consider:

Παῦλος (Paulos - Paul) did not write Romans with chapter breaks or verse numbers.

He wrote a continuous letter - one flowing argument from beginning to end. The chapter divisions were added over 1,000 years later by Archbishop Stephen Langton in 1227 AD.

This matters enormously because the artificial break between Romans 12:21 and 13:1 functions as a διαβολικός (diabolikos - diabolical) tool that:

1. Interrupts the natural λόγος flow
2. Hides the glaring contradiction
3. Makes readers compartmentalize instead of questioning
4. Protects corrupted interpolations from detection

Let's test Romans 13:1-7 the way we should test any suspect passage - by reading it as Paul actually wrote it, in continuous flow, and scoring it against the same Five-Point Λόγος Framework we developed for exposing Old Testament corruptions.

The Seamless Flow Test: Romans 12:1 - 14:23

When we remove the chapter break and read Romans as one continuous argument, something becomes immediately obvious:

The Continuous Flow (without artificial breaks)

Section	Core Theme (Greek key words)	Direction
12:1-2	Παρακαλῶ … μὴ συσχηματίζεσθε τῷ αἰῶνι τούτῳ (Do not be conformed to this age)	Anti-world-system
12:3-8	One body, many members, χάρισμα gifts	Community of love
12:9-21	Ἡ ἀγάπη ἀνυπόκριτος … εἰρηνεύετε … μὴ ἑαυτοὺς ἐκδικοῦντες (Love without hypocrisy, live at peace, never avenge yourselves)	Radical non-violence & enemy-love
13:1-7	ἐξουσίαις ὑπερεχούσαις ὑποτάσσεσθε … φόρους τελεῖτε … φόβος … τιμή (Submit to governing authorities, pay taxes, fear, honor)	Sudden pro-state obedience
13:8-10	Μηδενὶ μηδὲν ὀφείλετε εἰ μὴ τὸ ἀγαπᾶν … πλήρωμα οὖν νόμου ἡ ἀγάπη (Owe no one anything except to love… love is the fulfillment of the law)	Back to radical love as the only "debt"
13:11-14	καὶρὸς … τὰ ἔργα τοῦ σκότους ἀποβαλώμεθα … ἐνδυσώμεθα τὸν Κύριον Ἰησοῦν Χριστόν (The night is far spent… put on the Lord Jesus Christ)	Urgent separation from darkness
14:1-23	Μὴ κρίνετε … εἰρήνην διώκομεν (Do not judge one another… pursue peace)	Continued non-violence & conscience freedom

What This Reveals

Romans 12:1-12:21 and 13:8-14:23 form a perfectly coherent unit built entirely on:

• Non-conformity to the world system
• Enemy-love and radical peace-making
• Absolute refusal of personal vengeance
• Love as the ONLY obligation
• Separation from the works of darkness

Romans 13:1-7 is the ONLY section in the entire three-chapter flow that commands:

• Submission to the very αἰών τούτῳ (aiōn touto - this age/world system) we were just told NOT to conform to
• Payment of φόρους (phorous - taxes) and τιμή (timē - honor) to the same Roman powers that crucified Χριστός
• φόβος (phobos - fear) and honor to Caesar's regime
• Acceptance that the Roman sword-bearer is Θεοῦ διάκονος (Theou diakonos - God's servant) for our good

The Devastating Contradiction

The table above reveals the flow. Now let's examine the specific contradictions with full Greek text:

Romans 12:21 ends with:

"μὴ νικῶ ὑπὸ τοῦ κακοῦ ἀλλὰ νίκα ἐν τῷ ἀγαθῷ τὸ κακόν" (mē nikō hypo tou kakou alla nika en tō agathō to kakon) "Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good"

[Then suddenly, verses 13:1-7 command the opposite:]

Romans 13:1: "Πᾶσα ψυχὴ ἐξουσίαις ὑπερεχούσαις ὑποτασσέσθω" (Pasa psychē exousiais hyperechousais hypotassesthō) "Let every soul submit to the governing authorities"

Romans 13:4: "Θεοῦ γὰρ διάκονός ἐστιν σοὶ εἰς τὸ ἀγαθόν" (Theou gar diakonos estin soi eis to agathon) "For he is God's servant to you for good"

Claims the Roman magistrate bearing the sword (μάχαιραν - machairan) is Θεός' servant!

Romans 13:6-7: "διὰ τοῦτο γὰρ καὶ φόρους τελεῖτε … ἀπόδοτε πᾶσιν τὰς ὀφειλάς, τῷ τὸν φόρον τὸν φόρον, τῷ τὸ τέλος τὸ τέλος, τῷ τὸν φόβον τὸν φόβον, τῷ τὴν τιμὴν τὴν τιμήν" (dia touto gar kai phorous teleite ... apodote pasin tas opheilas, tō ton phoron ton phoron, tō to telos to telos, tō ton phobon ton phobon, tō tēn timēn tēn timēn) "For this reason you also pay taxes ... Pay to all what is owed: taxes to whom taxes are due, revenue to whom revenue is due, fear to whom fear, honor to whom honor"

[Then immediately, verse 13:8 returns to Paul's actual voice:]

Romans 13:8: "Μηδενὶ μηδὲν ὀφείλετε εἰ μὴ τὸ ἀλλήλους ἀγαπᾶν" (Mēdeni mēden opheilete ei mē to allēlous agapan) "Owe NO ONE ANYTHING except to love one another"

Wait - we just read in 13:6-7 that we "owe" (ὀφειλάς - opheilas) taxes, fear, and honor to Caesar!

But now in 13:8, Paul says we owe μηδὲν (mēden - NOTHING) to anyone except ἀγάπη (agapē - love)?

This is not the same voice.

Five-Point Λόγος Testing: Romans 13:1-7

Let's apply the same rigorous framework we used to expose Old Testament genocide commands.

Test 1: Χριστός Character Match

Γραφή Anchor: John 14:9 - "He who has seen Me has seen the Father"

Secondary Anchor: Matthew 22:21 - "Render to Caesar what is Caesar's, and to God what is God's"

Testing Question: Does Romans 13:1-7 align with what we see in Ἰησοῦς?

What we see in Jesus:

• Paid temple tax but declared Peter's sons "free" (Matthew 17:24-27)
• Said "render to Caesar" while overturning temple money-changers' tables
• Predicted Jerusalem's destruction, not submission to its authorities
• Never called Pilate "Θεοῦ διάκονος" (God's servant)
• Never taught "the sword-bearing magistrate serves you for good"
• Died at the hands of these "governing authorities"
• Taught His kingdom is "not of this world" (John 18:36)

What Romans 13:1-7 commands:

• Universal submission to governing authorities
• Claims "there is no authority except from God"
• Calls the Roman sword-bearer "God's servant for your good"
• Commands payment of taxes as owed debt
• Commands giving fear and honor to Caesar's regime

Score: 1.5/10 (Significant misalignment with Χριστός' teaching and example)

Test 2: Λόγος Consistency

Γραφή Anchor: Romans 12:2 - "μὴ συσχηματίζεσθε τῷ αἰῶνι τούτῳ" (Do not be conformed to this age)

Secondary Anchor: Romans 12:19 - "μὴ ἑαυτοὺς ἐκδικοῦντες" (Never avenge yourselves)

Testing Question: Does this passage create internal contradiction within Paul's own argument?

Immediate context contradiction:

As shown in the flow analysis above, 13:1-7 directly contradicts Paul's own argument:

•           Commands submission to the very age we're told not to conform to (12:2 vs 13:1)

 

•           Calls the ruler an "avenger" (ἔκδικος - ekdikos) immediately after telling us never to avenge ourselves (12:19 vs 13:4)

 

•           Tells us to fear evil rulers who bear the sword, contradicting "overcome evil with good" (12:21 vs 13:4)

Score: 0.8/10 (Direct contradiction of immediate context)

Test 3: Πνεῦμα Fruit Evidence

Γραφή Anchor: Galatians 5:22-23 - "The fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control"

Testing Question: What fruit has Romans 13:1-7 produced through history?

Historical fruit of Romans 13:1-7:

• Used by Roman emperors to persecute Christians who wouldn't worship Caesar
• Used by Constantine to merge church and state
• Used to justify the "divine right of kings" (we do not like the word “divine”, but are using it here only to reference a commonly used phrase – see more info at my other blog post SpirituallySmart.Com's Blog: Grok Comments on my AI Concerns)
• Used by Catholic Church during Inquisition
• Used by Protestant state churches to persecute Anabaptists
• Used by Nazi Germany ("Romans 13 says submit to Hitler!")
• Used by every tyrannical regime claiming authority from God
• Currently used to justify Christian nationalism

Πνεῦμα Ἅγιος produces: Love, peace, patience, kindness, gentleness Romans 13:1-7 produces: State persecution, tyranny justification, sword-bearing violence

Score: 0.5/10 (Produces opposite of Πνεῦμα fruit - the worst score possible)

Test 4: Non-Contradiction Test

Γραφή Anchor: Romans 13:8 - "Owe no one anything except to love one another"

Testing Question: Does Romans 13:1-7 contradict other clear New Testament teaching?

Direct contradictions:

Romans 13:6-7 says: "Pay to all what is owed (τὰς ὀφειλάς - tas opheilas): taxes, revenue, fear, honor"

Romans 13:8 says (immediately after): "Owe (ὀφείλετε - opheilete) no one anything except to love"

These verses use the same root word (ὀφείλω - opheilō - to owe/be indebted):

• 13:7: ὀφειλάς (opheilas - debts/obligations)
• 13:8: ὀφείλετε (opheilete - owe/are indebted)

The contradiction: 13:7 lists multiple debts we owe. 13:8 says we owe nothing except love.

Additional contradictions:

• Acts 5:29 - "We must obey God rather than men" (Peter and apostles)
• Revelation 13 - The beast demands worship and allegiance (opposite of Romans 13:1-7's compliance)
• Acts 16:37 - Paul refuses unlawful treatment, claims Roman citizenship rights
• Acts 22:25 - Paul challenges unlawful beating
• Acts 25:11 - Paul appeals to Caesar only to avoid murder, not from principle of submission

Score: 0.9/10 (Directly contradicts its own immediate context plus apostolic practice)

Test 5: Historical Integrity

Γραφή Anchor: 2 Corinthians 3:6 - "The letter kills, but the spirit gives life"

Secondary Anchor: Context of early church persecution

Testing Question: Is there evidence this passage was corrupted, added, or misunderstood?

Evidence of corruption/interpolation:

1. Vocabulary inconsistency:

• ὑποτάσσεσθε (hypotassesthe - submit): Only here in Romans in this political sense
• φόρος (phoros - tax): Only in 13:6-7 in all of Paul's writings
• τιμή/φόβος to rulers (timē/phobos - honor/fear to authorities): Never elsewhere in Paul
• This is not Paul's normal vocabulary pattern

2. Historical context:

• Written during Nero's reign (54-68 AD)
• Nero blamed Christians for Rome's fire (64 AD)
• Nero executed Peter and Paul
• Romans was written TO believers facing persecution
• Would Paul tell them their persecutor is "God's servant for your good"?

3. Early church practice:

• Christians refused to worship Caesar (directly violating "honor" command)
• Christians refused military service (rejecting the "sword" as God's servant)
• Christians were martyred for NOT submitting to governing authorities
• No early Christian writing quotes Romans 13:1-7 to justify submission until AFTER Constantine

4. Textual evidence:

• Marcion's canon (140 AD) may not have included this passage
• Early manuscripts show variations in this section
• The flow from 12:21 to 13:8 is seamless when 13:1-7 is removed

Score: 1.2/10 (Strong evidence of later insertion or corruption)

Overall Λόγος-Coherence Score

Test Criterion	Evidence from Immediate Context	Score
Χριστός Character Match	Jesus never taught sword-bearing magistrate is God's servant; died at hands of these authorities	1.5/10
Λόγος Consistency	Directly contradicts 12:2 (don't conform) and 12:19 (never avenge)	0.8/10
Πνεῦμα Fruit Evidence	Has been used for 1700 years to justify state persecution of believers - opposite of Galatians 5 fruit	0.5/10
Non-Contradiction Test	13:8 immediately negates any other "debt" including taxes/fear/honor just commanded in 13:6-7	0.9/10
Historical Integrity	Vocabulary inconsistent with Paul; context of persecution; early church practice contradicts it	1.2/10

OVERALL SCORE: 1.0/10

This is catastrophically low - even lower than the Old Testament genocide passages when tested against Χριστός (which scored 0.9/10).

Romans 13:1-7 fails the continuous λόγος-flow test at the highest level of ἀλογία (alogia - illogic) ever measured with this tool.

What Actually Happened: Two Theories

When a passage scores this poorly, we have strong evidence of textual corruption. There are two likely scenarios:

Theory 1: Early Marginal Gloss (Pre-100 AD)

A Roman-friendly scribe added a marginal note attempting to help Christians avoid persecution:

• "Be wise - submit outwardly to avoid trouble"
• "Pay taxes to stay safe"
• "Don't give them excuse to persecute you"

This pastoral advice (however misguided) was later copied into the main text by a scribe who thought it belonged there.

Evidence for this:

• Explains vocabulary differences (different author)
• Explains flow disruption (wasn't meant to be in continuous text)
• Explains why early Christians ignored it (they knew it wasn't original)

Theory 2: Deliberate Insertion (3rd-4th Century)

During the era when the church was being co-opted by the state under Constantine (312 AD onward), this passage was deliberately inserted to:

• Justify the new church-state merger
• Make Christians compliant subjects
• Remove the anti-imperial edge from Paul's teaching
• Create biblical support for "Christendom"

Evidence for this:

• Perfect timing with Constantine's takeover
• Serves exactly the interests of state-church system
• Became heavily quoted ONLY after this period
• Used to persecute those who maintained original apostolic resistance

The Real Paul: Removing the Corruption

When we remove Romans 13:1-7 and read Paul's actual flow, something beautiful emerges:

Romans 12:21: "μὴ νικῶ ὑπὸ τοῦ κακοῦ ἀλλὰ νίκα ἐν τῷ ἀγαθῷ τὸ κακόν" (mē nikō hypo tou kakou alla nika en tō agathō to kakon) "Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good"

[Remove 13:1-7]

Romans 13:8: "Μηδενὶ μηδὲν ὀφείλετε εἰ μὴ τὸ ἀλλήλους ἀγαπᾶν" (Mēdeni mēden opheilete ei mē to allēlous agapan) "Owe no one anything except to love one another"

THIS is the true Pauline gospel:

• Overcome evil with good (not with the sword)
• Owe nothing to anyone (not taxes, fear, or honor to Caesar)
• Love alone is the fulfillment of the law (not submission to authorities)

The flow is perfect. The λόγος is consistent. The πνεῦμα breathes life.

Answering the Objection: "But It's in the Bible!"

Objection: "Romans 13:1-7 is in every Bible manuscript we have. How can you say it doesn't belong?"

Response: Let's apply the same logic Ἰησοῦς and the apostles used:

1. Test Against Χριστός

John 14:9: "He who has seen Me has seen the Father"

Does Romans 13:1-7 align with Jesus? No.

• Jesus never called Pilate "God's servant"
• Jesus never taught submission to sword-bearing authorities
• Jesus died resisting these "God-ordained" powers

Conclusion: If it contradicts Χριστός, it contradicts Θεός.

2. Test Against Paul's Own Practice

Acts 16:37: Paul claims Roman citizenship to expose injustice Acts 22:25: Paul refuses unlawful beating Acts 25:11: Paul appeals to Caesar only to avoid murder

Paul didn't practice what Romans 13:1-7 commands. He constantly challenged authorities, exposed injustice, and used every legal means to resist.

Conclusion: This doesn't match Paul's actual behavior.

3. Test Against Early Church Practice

The early church was martyred for refusing to do what Romans 13:1-7 commands:

• They refused to honor Caesar as lord
• They refused to offer incense to the emperor
• They refused to serve in the military
• They refused to submit when commanded to worship idols

Conclusion: The earliest Christians didn't believe Romans 13:1-7.

4. Test Against Λόγος Flow

When you read Romans 12-14 continuously, Romans 13:1-7 sticks out like a sore thumb. It violently interrupts:

Before (12:21): "Overcome evil with good" The interruption (13:1-7): "Submit to the evil authorities" After (13:8): "Owe nothing except love"

Conclusion: It breaks the natural flow of the argument.

5. Test the Fruit

Matthew 7:16: "By their fruits you will know them"

Romans 13:1-7 has produced:

• Justification for state persecution of believers
• "Divine right of kings" tyranny (We do not like the word “divine”, but are using it here only to reference a commonly used phrase – see more info at my other blog post SpirituallySmart.Com's Blog: Grok Comments on my AI Concerns)
• Nazi obedience
• Every authoritarian claim of authority from God

Conclusion: This is not the fruit of Πνεῦμα Ἅγιος.

The Theological Stakes

This isn't just an academic exercise. Romans 13:1-7 has real-world consequences:

It Makes God the Author of Evil Governments

If "there is no authority except from God" (13:1) applies universally, then every tyrannical regime documented in our Πνεῦμα Fruit test above was ordained by God, and He commands us to submit to evil.

This makes Θεός Πατήρ look like a monster. Just like the OT genocide commands which we previously proved also not to be scripture in the last 2 blogs.

It Contradicts the Gospel of the Kingdom

Ἰησοῦς proclaimed: "ἡ βασιλεία ἐμὴ οὐκ ἔστιν ἐκ τοῦ κόσμου τούτου" (hē basileia emē ouk estin ek tou kosmou toutou) - "My kingdom is not of this world" (John 18:36)

Romans 13:1-7 makes Caesar's kingdom as legitimate as Christ's.

It Enslaves Believers to the State

The New Testament teaches:

• "We must obey God rather than men" (Acts 5:29)
• "Do not be conformed to this world" (Romans 12:2)
• "Our citizenship is in heaven" (Philippians 3:20)

Romans 13:1-7 contradicts all of this, making believers into compliant subjects of earthly powers.

Practical Application: What Do We Do Now?

When Someone Quotes Romans 13:1-7 to Justify State Authority:

Response Framework:

"Let's test that passage using the λόγος framework:

Point them to the continuous flow analysis showing how 13:1-7 interrupts Paul's argument from 12:21 to 13:8.

Ask: 'How can we owe taxes, fear, and honor in 13:6-7 but owe nothing in 13:8?'

Show the 1.0/10 score: This passage fails every test - Χριστός' character, λόγος consistency, Πνεῦμα fruit, internal contradiction, and historical integrity.

Conclusion: Romans 13:1-7 is almost certainly a later insertion that doesn't represent Paul's actual teaching."

When Facing Government Overreach:

Remember:

• Ἰησοῦς is ὁ μόνος Κύριος (ho monos Kyrios - the ONLY Lord)
• No other authority is absolute
• "We must obey God rather than men" (Acts 5:29)
• Test all claims against Χριστός' character and teaching

When Building Communities of Faith:

Focus on:

• Romans 12:1-21 (the real Paul)
• Romans 13:8-14 (the continued real Paul)
• Enemy love, radical peace-making, non-violence
• Separation from worldly systems
• Love as the only debt

Conclusion: Ἰησοῦς Alone is Lord

Ἐν Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ τῷ μόνῳ Κυρίῳ, οὐ Καίσαρι

(En Christō Iēsou tō monō Kyriō, ou Kaisari)

In Christ Jesus the only Lord, not Caesar

The central confession of the early church was: "Ἰησοῦς Κύριος" (Iēsous Kyrios - Jesus is Lord)

This was a political statement. It meant Caesar is not lord.

Romans 13:1-7, as traditionally interpreted, undermines this confession by making Caesar's authority equal to God's authority.

But when we test this passage using the Five-Point Λόγος Framework, it scores 1.0/10 - the lowest score of any New Testament passage we've tested.

This is not accidental. This is evidence of textual corruption designed to make Christians into compliant subjects of the state rather than counter-cultural witnesses to the Kingdom of Θεός.

As shown in "The Real Paul" section above, when we remove 13:1-7, the seamless flow from 12:21 to 13:8 reveals the authentic apostolic teaching.

The True Teaching Remains Clear

Beyond Romans, the consistent New Testament witness affirms:

Philippians 3:20: "ἡμῶν γὰρ τὸ πολίτευμα ἐν οὐρανοῖς ὑπάρχει" (hēmōn gar to politeuma en ouranois hyparchei) "For our citizenship is in heaven"

Acts 5:29: "πειθαρχεῖν δεῖ Θεῷ μᾶλλον ἢ ἀνθρώποις" (peitharchein dei Theō mallon ē anthrōpois) "We must obey God rather than men"

This is the apostolic teaching. This is the gospel of the Kingdom. This is the Way of Ἰησοῦς Χριστός.

Everything else - including Romans 13:1-7 - must be tested against this standard.

And when tested, Romans 13:1-7 fails catastrophically.

πάσα δόξα (pasa doxa - all glory) to Ἰησοῦς Χριστός (Iēsous Christos), ὁ μόνος Κύριος (ho monos Kyrios - the only Lord), who exposes every corruption that attempts to make Caesar equal to Θεός!

The λόγος testing framework reveals what the early church knew: There is only one Lord, and it's not Caesar.

Ἐν Χριστῷ Ἰησοῦ τῷ Σωτῆρι ἡμῶν, τῷ μόνῳ Κυρίῳ καὶ Δεσπότῃ (En Christō Iēsou tō Sōtēri hēmōn, tō monō Kyriō kai Despotē) In Christ Jesus our Savior, the only Lord and Master

---

Thomas Richards has studied the bible for over 28 years. For approximately the last nine, he has been studying biblical Greek with the Septuagint. This analysis applies the same rigorous λόγος (logos) testing methodology used to expose Old Testament corruptions to a New Testament passage that has been weaponized for 1,700 years to justify state tyranny. For more biblical analysis and exposure of institutional corruption, visit SpirituallySmart.com and OvertPsyops.ai